
Down-Payment Woes
August 1, 2007; As originally appeared Builder Magazine
by Pat Curry
In yet another tightening of mortgage lending, HUD has proposed
the elimination of seller-funded down-payment assistance programs
for loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).
HUD
has always prohibited sellers, including builders, from giving
money for down payments directly to FHA borrowers, who are
required to put down at least 3 percent of the purchase price.
However, under current regulations, gifts are allowed from
friends and family, employers, labor unions, and government
agencies, as well as charitable organizations, which has led
to the establishment of dozens of groups such as the Sacramento,
Calif.–based Nehemiah Corporation of America.
Many
of these organizations work directly with sellers, including
builders. Under the seller-funded down-payment assistance
model, the charitable organization provides a gift to the
buyer to use for his down payment; that gift is then reimbursed
by the seller, which also pays the organization an administrative
fee. In the last decade, such organizations have helped 600,000
families buy homes, says Scott Syphax, president and CEO of
Nehemiah.
Under
the new regulation, the donation to the charitable organization
could not come from the seller, “any other person or
entity that financially benefits from the transaction, or
any third party or entity that is reimbursed directly or indirectly”
by the seller, the proposed ruling states.
It's
certainly not good news for home builders, especially those
that cater to entry-level buyers. Steve Palmer, CFO of Atlanta-based
Bowen Family Homes, says that without down-payment assistance
or the availability of 100 percent financing, 40 percent to
50 percent of first-time home buyers wouldn't qualify.
“With
the meltdown of the sub-prime and alt-A markets, the loss
of these programs without a true 100 percent FHA financing
product to replace them would be devastating to the starter
home–buying market,” Palmer says.
This
is the second time in eight years that HUD has tried to do
away with seller-funded down-payment assistance on FHA loans.
HUD officials declined to comment about the proposed regulation
during the 60-day public comment period, but provided detailed
background information on its reasoning.
In
congressional testimony earlier this year, HUD's inspector
general, Kenneth Donohue, cited a 2005 General Accounting
Office report that said the probability of default on FHA
loans with seller-funded down-payment assistance was 76 percent
higher than comparable loans without it.
A
HUD study of the programs also cites concerns about inflated
appraisals and sales prices to cover the seller's down-payment
contribution and a tendency for buyers to not receive counseling
that would help them make the transition to homeownership.
Syphax
says his organization has tried to get HUD to address those
issues over the years, with no success. With the increased
number of defaults on exotic loans normally marketed to subprime
borrowers, this isn't the time to eliminate seller-funded
down-payment assistance, he says.
“Part
of the irony of trying to kill off Nehemiah-style down-payment
assistance is that funding for working families is drying
up,” Syphax says. “One of the last successful
programs is becoming increasingly the only game in town, and
that's when the federal government tries to close the last
door to opportunity for folks who have no other options.”
Well,
maybe not the last door. The proposed rule doesn't ban assistance
from charities that receive their funding from parties with
no financial interest in the transaction. The Housing Development
Fund in Stamford, Conn., for example, gets its down-payment
assistance money from state, federal, and philanthropic sources.
The organization avoids seller-funded assistance because it
doesn't benefit the buyer, says Joan Carty, president and
CEO of the Housing Development Fund.
“There's
a lot of pressure to bring in an appraisal to meet the assistance
[when it is seller-funded],” she says. “It's a
rush job. There are additional fees and transactional costs
and not enough checks in place.”
Regardless
of whether HUD adopts this regulation, seller-funded down-payment
assistance more than likely will disappear. The Internal Revenue
Service ruled in 2006 that seller-funded down-payment assistance
programs aren't charities for tax purposes; the process of
examining those groups' tax-exempt status is already underway.
|